ICLE Homepage | Other Proposed Amendments to MCRs
July 7, 2006
ADM File No. 2004-48
Proposed Amendment of
Rules 8.103, 8.108, and 8.109
of the Michigan Court Rules
On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering amendments of
Rules 8.103, 8.108, and 8.109 of the Michigan Court Rules. Before determining whether the
proposal should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford
interested persons the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposals or to
suggest alternatives. The Court welcomes the views of all. This matter will be considered at
a public hearing. The notices and agendas for public hearings are posted on the Court's
website at www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt.
Publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the
subject, nor does it imply probable adoption of the proposal in its present form.
ICLE Editor's Note:
[Italicized, bracketed text] indicates text that has been deleted.
Bold text indicates new text.
Rule 8.103 State Court Administrator
The state court administrator, under the Supreme Court's supervision and direction, shall:
(1)-(8) [Unchanged.]
(9) approve and publish forms as required by these rules, and such other
recommended forms as the administrator deems advisable; and
[(10)] [certify the adequacy of recording devices to be used for making
records of different types of proceedings in trial courts pursuant to these rules
and applicable statutes and publish a list of certified recording devices and the
proceedings for which they are certified for use; and
]
[(11)] [Renumbered as (10), but otherwise unchanged.]
Rule 8.108 Court Reporters and Recorders
(A)-(F) [Unchanged.]
(G) Certification.
(1) Certification Requirement.
(a) Only reporters, recorders, [operators,] or voice writers certified
pursuant to this subrule may record or prepare transcripts of
proceedings held in Michigan courts or of depositions taken in
Michigan pursuant to these rules. This rule applies to the preparation of
transcripts of videotaped courtroom proceedings or videotaped or
audiotaped depositions, but not to the recording of such proceedings or
depositions by means of videotaping. An operator holding a CEO
certification under subrule (G)(7)(b) may record proceedings, but may
not prepare transcripts.
(b) Proceedings held pursuant to MCR 6.102 or 6.104 need not be recorded
by persons certified under this rule; however, transcripts of such
proceedings must be prepared by court reporters, recorders,
[operators,] or voice writers certified pursuant to this rule.
(c)-(f) [Unchanged.]
(2)-(5) [Unchanged.]
(6) Renewal, Review, and Revocation of Certification.
(a) Certifications under this rule must be renewed annually. The fee for
renewal is $30. Renewal applications must be filed by August 1. A
renewal application filed after that date must be accompanied by an
additional late fee of $[30]100. The board may require
certified reporters, recorders, operators, and voice writers to submit, as
a condition of renewal, such information as the board reasonably deems
necessary to determine that the reporter, recorder, operator, or voice
writer has used his or her reporting or recording skills during the
preceding year.
(b)-(d) [Unchanged.]
(7) [Unchanged.]
Rule 8.109 Mechanical Recording of Court Proceedings
(A) Official Record. If a trial court uses audio or video recording devices for making the
record of court proceedings, it shall use only recording devices that meet the
standards as published by the State Court Administrative Office. [approved by
the state court administrator pursuant to MCR 8.103(10). Except where such a
requirement was previously imposed by statute, this provision shall apply only to
recording devices purchased after the effective date of this subrule.
]
(B) [Unchanged.]
Staff Comment: These changes would clarify that certified electronic operators do not
have the authority to prepare transcripts. The amendments would also increase the late renewal
fee to $100, and would remove references to approval by the state court administrator of
recording devices, requiring instead that recording systems meet SCAO-approved standards.
The staff comment is not an authoritative construction by the Court.
A copy of this order will be given to the Secretary of the State Bar and to the State
Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201.
Comments on these proposals may be sent to the Supreme Court Clerk in writing or
electronically by November 1, 2006, at P.O. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909, or
MSC_clerk@courts.mi.gov. When filing a comment, please refer to ADM File No. 2004-48.
Your comments and the comments of others will be posted at
www.courts.mi.gov/supremecourt/resources/administrative/index.htm.